Industry News

Facebook Says Rape Page is Okay

NL- just as long as you don’t post any photos of cleavage, cuz then they will have to delete you! Violence-Good!  Sex-Bad! Idiots…


thanks Don

Cyber anarchists blamed for unleashing a series of Facebook ‘rape pages’
A shadowy network of “cyber-anarchists” has been linked to a proliferation of controversial “rape pages” on Facebook that are drawing millions of users, including many young Britons, Australians and Americans, to the social networking site.

An administrator of the “rape page” posted an online defence in response to the controversy, insisting that he did not support or promote rape but then directing a sarcastic barb at critics

By Philip Sherwell, New York
7:30AM BST 16 Oct 2011

Nobody knows better than MJ Stephens that rape is no laughing matter. So as the survivor of a sexual assault, she was horrified when she encountered the contents of a Facebook page full of jokes about rape and violence towards women.
But worse was to come when the young American woman tried to argue with the people who had attached their comments to the page called “You know shes [sic] playing hard to get when your [sic] chasing her down an alleyway” – most of them teenagers and young adults from Britain and Australia.
In sickeningly explicit terms, several of them threatened her and expressed the wish that she be raped again.
Such pages, full of ugliness, aggression and pornographic language are multiplying on Facebook, drawing lucrative user traffic to the social networking site.
Now it has emerged that one of the “administrators” of the page – users with the right to edit its content – is believed to be a British schoolboy linked to a network of hackers in Britain, Australia and America who have set up Facebook pages featuring offensive sexual and violent content.

Micheal O’Brien, a Canadian computer systems engineer who co-founded the Rape Is No Joke (RINJ) campaign to pressure Facebook to delete “rape pages” via petitions and boycotts, has tracked the activity on several such pages and contacted participants online.
He told The Sunday Telegraph that associates of 4chan, a loose-knit collection of international “cyber-anarchists” who champion absolute online freedom, including for some the right to share pornography, have founded and administer several of the pages.
The RINJ’s own website has been attacked by hackers and campaigners have been subjected to virulent online onslaughts since they started to draw attention to the 4chan connection last week. Pro-4chan images have also been posted to the “alleyway” page.
Facebook protects the identity of those who set up and run pages. But Mr O’Brien has identified several posters as likely page administrators, including a teenage boy in Britain and college students in Australia.
With nearly 210,000 people indicating that they “like” it, and many million of monthly visitors, the “alleyway” page is the most popular. Others include “Abducting, raping and violently murdering your friend as a joke”, “Pinning your mate down while someone HIV positive rapes him for a laugh”, “Police call it a restraining order, we call it playing hard to get” and “Turning into a chain smoking sexual predator when you drink”.

Many of the regular users who “post” on the pages are young Britons and Australians – many of them still at school, judging from information on their own Facebook profile pages. The website allows any child aged 13 or older is allowed to open an account.
Activists and victims’ support groups in Britain and America, where Facebook is based, have urged the social networking site to shut down and remove the pages. But despite an online petition signed by more than 200,000 people worldwide, the internet giant is refusing to do so.
Facebook did not respond to repeated requests for comment by The Sunday Telegraph. But in response to previous complaints about the pages, the company has said that while they may express “outrageous or offensive” opinions, they do not violate its rules banning content that is hateful or incites violence.
“It is very important to point out that what one person finds offensive, another can find entertaining,” a spokesman said. “Just as telling a rude joke won’t get you thrown out of your local pub, it won’t get you thrown off Facebook.”

An administrator of the “rape page” posted an online defence in response to the controversy, insisting that he did not support or promote rape but then directing a sarcastic barb at critics.
“i d[o] not support rape this group doesn’t,” the person wrote, with a lack of grammar and in internet shorthand characteristic of many postings. “thanks for supporting us uve made us get even more likes i thank u for that but this group has not dne anything wrong according to theterms and cnditions f facebook groups s if it does get taken down it will result in court because it has done nothing wrong.”
Facebook’s refusal to remove the pages has outraged campaigners and victim support groups in Britain and America. “It’s ludicrous to compare the content on this page to pub humour,” said Jane Osmond, co-editor of the Women’s Views on News website that has led the campaign in Britain.
“Rape is a crime and we live in a society where the threat of rape is in the mind of every woman who has walked down a street alone at night. Making a joke about rape is not just not funny, it allows people to dismiss it as something not serious.

“The page has become a receptacle for hateful threatening language that singles out women. Children as young as 13 can access this page. It is unacceptable.”
Miss Stephens, who lives in New Mexico and is part of the RINJ campaign, was equally shocked by Facebook’s attitude. “I was horrified to find content so graphically violent towards women and it blatantly breaches their terms of use,” she said. “Such hateful speech against women and graphic descriptions of violence are not jokes that would be acceptable in the pub.
“Those who post in this way are certainly mostly teenage boys and young men saying inappropriate things, but we do believe that these sites have attracted sexual predators too. It is a dangerous group with some dangerous users.”

She believes that Facebook would have removed the site if the same jokes or threats were aimed at ethnic minority groups rather than women. And its ban on nude photographs means that pictures of mothers breastfeeding are now allowed. “It is shameless double standards,” she said.
Activists who have gone online to make their case, and to publish images for a campaign promoting consensual rather than forced sexual activity, have been subjected to such a violent response that some have complained to the police.
Campaigners on both sides of the Atlantic have now switched their attention to businesses as they believe Facebook is inclined to allow the pages to continue because of the viewers and hence advertising revenue they bring in.
“Facebook will only listen to money, so we are now targeting the advertisers who have appeared on their pages,” said Miss Osmond. “We are delighted with the response of companies like John Lewis that pulled their ads.”

Major companies that advertise on Facebook were furious to discover that their advertisements were appearing on the “rape page” and demanded they be removed. They included Barclays, 02, John Lewis, Sony, BlackBerry, American Express, Groupon, Heinz, National Lottery, the White Company and PepsiCo.
After complaints from several businesses to Facebook, the “alleyway” page was “whitelisted” last week, meaning that no adverts could be rotated on it. But advertisements continue to appear on other pages where the content was just as offensive.

“Facebook will only listen to money so we are now targeting the advertisers who have appeared on their pages,” said Miss Osmond. “We are delighted with the response of companies that have pulled their ads.” RINJ is making similar headway with North American advertisers.
A spokesman for John Lewis, one of the first companies to withdraw its adverts from the “alleyway” page said yesterday that it was not aware its advertising was still appearing on other offensive pages.
“Unfortunately, we cannot control what pages people are viewing on Facebook,” he said. “We do not choose the page where our advertisements appear but we blacklist a number of content types.
“However, we take the issue of inappropriate content very seriously As soon as we become aware of any advertisement on a page that is not right for our customers we will have it removed.”
The controversy highlights a dark side of the burgeoning world of social networking. Some media commentators said the “rape pages” were the latest example of the dangers of unfettered anonymity on social media websites.

Dr Aric Sigman, the author of Remotely Controlled and several papers on social media, said Facebook and other websites allowed contributors to post comments with no accountability.
“It makes the abnormal normal,” he said. “It creates an artificial world in which people can say things without the normal checks and balances, from adults and peer groups, that would be applied in real life.
“If you said some of those things in a pub, somebody would say you’ve had too much drink or you’re out of line. But on the internet it can appear to be normal when other join in anonymously and reinforce those views.”

Additional reporting by David Harrison in London

You Might Also Like